8 comments

  • divyaprakash 1 day ago
    I built this because I was tired of "AI tools" that were just wrappers around expensive APIs with high latency. As a developer who lives in the terminal (Arch/Nushell), I wanted something that felt like a CLI tool and respected my hardware.

    The Tech:

        GPU Heavy: It uses decord and PyTorch for scene analysis. I’m calculating action density and spectral flux locally to find hooks before hitting an LLM.
    
        Local Audio: I’m using ChatterBox locally for TTS to avoid recurring costs and privacy leaks.
    
        Rendering: Final assembly is offloaded to NVENC.
    
    Looking for Collaborators: I’m currently looking for PRs specifically around:

        Intelligent Auto-Zoom: Using YOLO/RT-DETR to follow the action in a 9:16 crop.
    
        Voice Engine Upgrades: Moving toward ChatterBoxTurbo or NVIDIA's latest TTS.
    
    It's fully dockerized, and also has a makefile. Would love some feedback on the pipeline architecture!
    • amelius 17 hours ago
      > Multi-Provider Support: Choose between OpenAI (GPT-5-mini, GPT-4o) or Google Gemini for scene analysis

      This is the first sentence in your features section, so it is not strange if users don't understand if this tool is running locally or not.

      • divyaprakash 17 hours ago
        Fair point. I used SOTA models for the analysis to prioritize quality, but since the heavy media processing is local, API costs stay negligible (or free). The architecture is modular, though—you can definitely swap in a local LLM for a fully air-gapped setup.
      • ramon156 21 hours ago
        I don't get this reasoning. You were tired of LLM wrappers, but what is your tool? These two requirements (felt like a CLI and respects your hardware) do not line up.

        Still a cool tool though! Although it seems partly AI generated.

        • rustyhancock 21 hours ago
          I've started including a statement of AI usage in my docs.

          HN is a niche audience but it seems like it's the first question everyone has when opening a repo.

          Which is odd because the first question we should have is, does it work.

          Personally I can't see myself ever writing the bulk of the README again, life's too short.

          • divyaprakash 20 hours ago
            Fair points all around. To be transparent: yes, I used an AI coding assistant (Antigravity) to help with the heavy lifting of refactoring the original legacy code and drafting the README. I’m with @rustyhancock on this—I’d rather focus my brainpower on the pipeline logic and hardware integration than on writing boilerplate and Markdown.

            However, orchestrating things like decord with CUDA kernels, managing VRAM across parallel processes, and getting audio sync right with local TTS requires a deep understanding of the stack. An LLM can help write a function, but it won't solve the architectural 'glue' needed to make it a reliable CLI tool.

            The project is open-source precisely because it’s a work in progress. It needs the 'human touch' for things like the RT-DETR auto-zoom and more nuanced video editing logic. PRs are more than welcome—I'd love to see where the community can push this beyond its current state.

            • Hamuko 20 hours ago
              I think my life's too short to ever read your READMEs.
              • pelasaco 15 hours ago
                The life ist too short to read AI generated README, which are clearly not written for humans..
            • fouc 20 hours ago
              Seems like the post you're replying to has since been edited to clarify that he's referring to the wrappers that rely on third party AI APIs over the internet rather than running locally.
            • pelasaco 15 hours ago
              You were tired of "AI tools", then you vibe-coded an AI tool to deal with that? Not sure if i get it why it deserves to be on "Show HN"
              • ithkuil 14 hours ago
                The sentence continued with "that were just wrappers ...".
            • HeartofCPU 22 hours ago
              It looks like it’s written by a LLM
              • divyaprakash 20 hours ago
                Guilty as charged. I used Antigravity to handle the refactoring and docs so I could stay focused on the CUDA and VRAM orchestration.
                • wasmainiac 12 hours ago
                  This isn’t a job interview, drop the corpo speak. What’s going on with Cuda and vram? We are all friends here.
                  • divyaprakash 11 hours ago
                    Haha fair enough.The actual internals are basically just one big fight with VRAM. I'm using decord to dump frames straight into GPU memory so the CPU doesn't bottleneck the pipeline. From there, everything—scene detection, hsv transforms, action scoring—is vectorized in torch (mostly fp16 to avoid ooming). I also had to chunk the audio stft/flux math because long files were just eating the card alive. The tts model stays cached as a singleton so it's snappy after the first run, and I'm manually tracking 'Allocated vs Reserved' memory to keep it from choking. Still plenty of refinement left on the roadmap, but it's a fun weekend project to mess around with.
              • Jgrace 16 hours ago
                [flagged]
              • wasmainiac 15 hours ago
                This does not seem local first. Misleading.

                Regardless, we need more tools like this to speed social media towards death.

                • divyaprakash 15 hours ago
                  If social is heading that way, at least my tool saves you the manual labor of editing the funeral.
                • techjamie 14 hours ago
                  I watched a video[1] recently that posited the idea of AI slop farms making large, auto-moderated spaces impossible to find meaningful human content in. With the idea that it'll lead to a renaissance for smaller, more personal websites like forums or other niche places to flourish.

                  I think that sounds a little too convenient and idealistic to be what really happens, but I did find the concept to be a potential positive to what's happening around it. Facebook is already a good portion of the way there, being stuffed with bots consuming stolen or AI content from other bots, with confused elderly people in the middle.

                  [1] https://youtu.be/_QlsGkDvVHU

                • Yash16 20 hours ago
                  Can I use this for other use cases instead of game videos? I want to create film-style scenes, cinematic elements, and smooth motion effects. I’m also thinking of deploying it as a SaaS and using it for video creation features in my app: https://picxstudio.com/
                  • divyaprakash 20 hours ago
                    Definitely. The architecture is modular—just swap the LLM prompts for 'cinematic' styles. It's headless and dockerized, so it fits well as a SaaS backend worker
                  • myky22 21 hours ago
                    Wow, great job.

                    I did smth similar 4 years ago with YOLO ultralytics.

                    Back then I used chat messsges spike as one of several variables to detect highs and fails moments. It needed a lot a human validation but was so fun.

                    Keep going

                    • divyaprakash 20 hours ago
                      Great idea. Integrating YOLO for 'Action Following' is high on the roadmap—I'd love a PR for that if you're interested!
                    • 8organicbits 17 hours ago
                      What's the intended use case for this? It seems like you'd create slop videos for social media. I'd love to see more AI use cases that aren't: uninteresting content people would prefer to avoid.
                      • divyaprakash 17 hours ago
                        It’s actually designed for your own gameplay—it scans hours long raw session to find the best highlights and clips them into shorts. It's more about automating the tedious editing process for your own content rather than generating "slop" from scratch.
                        • 8organicbits 16 hours ago
                          Personal consumption is an interesting angle. I'm starting to think AI content is only desirable to the creator, but no one else wants to see the slop.
                        • simianparrot 16 hours ago
                          Automating editing is by definition making it slop.
                    • mpaepper 19 hours ago
                      How much memory do you need locally? Is a rtx 3090 with 24gb enough?
                      • divyaprakash 19 hours ago
                        Yes, more than enough. I have rtx4080 laptop gpu with 12gb vram.
                      • Huston1992 19 hours ago
                        big fan of the 'respects my hardware' philosophy. i feel like 90% of ai tools right now are just expensive middleware for openai, so seeing something that actually leverages local compute (and doesn't leak data) is refreshing